Content

Advanced theoretical and practical sessions, case studies, ‘fishbowl’ videos, scenarios, and practice in small groups of both individual and group supervision, will support the exploration of more ethically challenging supervisory situations. Special focus on group supervision and the supervision of diverse This unit requires each student to log 10 hours as a group supervisor in training. Additionally, the students will receive at least 4 hours of group supervision provided by a UD recognised Spiritual Direction supervisor.

Unit code: PS9017Z

Unit status: Approved (Major revision)

Points: 18.0

Unit level: Postgraduate Elective

Unit discipline: Professional Supervision

Delivery Mode: Blended

Proposing College: School of Professional Practice - Professional Supervision

Show when this unit is running

Learning outcomes

1.

Demonstrate advanced knowledge and understanding of supervisory processes and practice in individual and group supervisory contexts

2.

Reflect critically on complex situations in supervision and articulate integrated responses

3.

Demonstrate advanced knowledge and understanding of psychodynamics in effective supervision

4.

Demonstrate capacity to evaluate and reflect upon own work as supervisor

5.

Evaluate with reference to contemporary literature, a range of supervision case studies and strategies to address the issues raised.

Pedagogy

All teaching material pre-recorded. Students to engage with material before class, 22 hours face to face engagement: 5 hours tutorial, 5 hours application, 12 hours practicum, 12 hours peer practicum sessions.

Indicative Bibliography

  • Fook, J &Gardner, F. Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook. United Kingdom: Open University Press, 2007.
  • Gardner, F. Being Critically Reflective: Practice Theory in Context. United Kingdom: Red Globe Press, 2014.
  • Obholzer, A & Zagier Roberts, V. The Unconscious at Work: A Tavistock Approach to Making Sense of Organisational Life. 2nd ed, London: Routledge, 2019.
  • Bassot, B. The Reflective Practice Guide. London: Routledge, 2016.
  • Corey, Gerald & Corey, Marianne Schneider & Corey, Cindy. Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions.10th ed. Centage, Boston, 2019.
  • Skovholt, Thomas. M & Trotter-Mathison, Michelle. The Resilient Practitioner: Burnout and Compassion, Fatigue prevention and Self-Care Strategies for the Helping Professions, 3rd ed. Routledge, London and New York, 2016.
  • Hawkins, Peter & Shohet, Robin. Supervision in the helping professions. 4th ed. Open University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.divinity.idm.oclc.org/lib/undiv/detail.action?docID=990490 https://divinity.on.worldcat.org/oclc/779244458
  • Long, S. Transforming Experience in Organisations: A Framework for Organisational Research and Consultancy. London: Karnac, 2016
  • Proctor, Brigid, Group supervision: A guide to creative practice. 2nd ed, Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 2008. https://divinity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=324221&site=eds-live
  • Carroll, Michael & Shaw, Elizabeth. Ethical Maturity in the Helping Professions: Making Difficult Life and Work Decisions. PsychOz Publications, Melbourne, 2012.

Assessment

Type Description Word count Weight (%)

Variant 1

Case Study

Students will identify and investigate a problem in a particular case example (situation), examine potential solutions and recommend effective interventions using supporting evidence.

1000 20.0
Essay - Essay; Poster/Presentation; Integrated project; Reflective Learning Journal (same rubric and criteria)

Students will draw together the learning of the unit and focus on integrating experience with theory. The processes and practices required to professionally supervise will be critiqued with particular attention given to supervisory context.

2500 35.0
Skill Demonstration - Assessment in the Room

A. Supervision in the room 30% (equiv 1500) Student practitioners will be assessed in real time as they take up their role as a professional supervisor. Student-to-student critique is integrated into this task. B. Critical Reflection 15% (write 1500) Students will critically reflect on one specific issue that was brought to their attention throughout the assessment-in-the-room experience

3000 45.0
Approvals

Unit approved for the University of Divinity by Prof Albert Haddad on 18 Dec, 2023

Unit record last updated: 2024-01-25 13:28:52 +1100