Content

This unit starts with the recognition that some Biblical texts seem to endorse behaviour which is harmful. Students will be encouraged to identify these “texts of terror” and develop apologetic, hermeneutic and transformative strategies to dismantle oppressive readings.

Unit code: DM3600T

Unit status: Approved (New unit)

Points: 18.0

Unit level: Undergraduate Level 3

Unit discipline: Missiology

Delivery Mode: Face to Face

Proposing College: Trinity College Theological School

Show when this unit is running

Learning outcomes

1.

Describe ways in which Scriptural texts have informed and supported negative ideology and behaviour

2.

Evaluate the history of interpretation of such texts

3.

Deconstruct harmful historical readings and present alternative interpretations

Unit sequence

An introductory unit in either BA or BN or equivalent

Pedagogy

Lectures, and class discussion; assignments

Indicative Bibliography

  • Blyth, Caroline et al. Rape Culture, Gender Violence and Religion: Biblical Perspectives. Cham: Springer, 2018.
  • Boer, Roland. Last Stop before Antarctica Atlanta: SBL, 2008
  • Campbell, Antony F. Making Sense of the Bible: Difficult Texts and Modern Faith. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist, 2010.
  • Caron, Gerald (ed), Women Also Journeyed with Him: Feminist Perspectives on the Bible. Collegeville: Liturgical Press,2000)
  • Kloppenborg , John S. (ed). Apocalypticism, Anti-Semitism and the Historical Jesus: Subtexts in Criticism. London: T&T Clark, 2005.
  • Loader, William. Making Sense of Sex: Attitudes towards Sexuality in Early Jewish and Christian Literature. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans, 2013.
  • Prior, Michael. The Bible and Colonialism: A Moral Critique. Sheffield: SAP, 1997.
  • Thompson, John L. *Writing the Wrongs: Women of the Old Testament from Philo through the Reformatio*n. Oxford, OUP, 2001
  • Trible, Phyllis. Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984.
  • Whitford, David M. The Curse of Ham in the Early Modern Era. Ashgate, 2009.

Assessment

Type Description Word count Weight (%)
Portfolio

Portfolio 1000 words

1000 20.0
Case Study

Case Study 2000 words

2000 40.0
Essay

Thematic Essay 2000 words

2000 40.0
Approvals

Unit approved for the University of Divinity by John Capper on 27 Sep, 2019

Unit record last updated: 2019-10-15 12:17:02 +1100